In Defense of Ghosting

Ghosting triggers everything from disappointed sighs to simmering resentment, as if ignoring a single text is a grave violation of social codes. Yet silence can serve as an act of self preservation. By opting out of a dialogue, we avoid the endless volley of messages that sometimes devolve into insincere politeness or forced small talk. A moment of hush can protect our boundaries while also sparing the other person from our potential annoyance or caustic retort.

Critics of ghosting often assume it is universally harmful. They fail to recognize that emotional needs vary among individuals. Some thrive on frequent communication and constant updates. Others prefer pockets of solitude to recharge. A short break from typing might prevent emotional fatigue or tedious exchanges that culminate in a tepid thumbs up emoji. Texts rarely capture the full range of human interaction, so a brief pause could save everyone from pointless chatter.

Silence will never be a flawless solution. It can create confusion and bruised egos, especially when a bond carries deeper emotional weight. Occasionally, though, not responding offers an opportunity for introspection. The best answer might be no answer, particularly when words feel coerced or hollow. This approach may disappoint those who crave instant validation, but it can serve as a genuine, if slightly awkward, form of self care. It is not always comfortable. Still, it can be a thoughtful way to step away from the pinging chaos and preserve some measure of peace.