The Pursuit of Purpose: A Construct That Deserves to Be Questioned
The pursuit of purpose has become a non-negotiable expectation in discussions about fulfillment and well-being. Popular wisdom insists that happiness hinges on identifying a singular, life-defining mission. This belief is so deeply ingrained that a lack of clarity about purpose is often framed as a personal failing. The problem is not that people want meaning. It is that they are taught to believe meaning must fit into a narrow, structured narrative.
How did we get here?
At its core, the demand to define a singular purpose is rigid. It assumes that fulfillment should stem from one overarching goal rather than an evolving collection of interests, relationships, and experiences. This approach to purpose does not allow for change. It suggests that a person should uncover a fixed truth about themselves rather than engage with the dynamic reality of being human. When people struggle to identify or maintain this sense of purpose, they internalize the struggle as a deficiency rather than recognizing that the expectation itself is flawed.

The modern obsession with purpose is also deeply entangled with productivity. In many cases, people are not actually searching for meaning. They are searching for a way to justify their existence through output. The demand to find purpose often disguises a cultural discomfort with rest, exploration, or any form of value that cannot be neatly measured. If purpose must be productive, then activities that do not generate progress (personal or professional) are viewed as wasteful. Even in leisure, people feel pressure to link enjoyment to a higher purpose. This can turn hobbies into side hustles, personal interests into branded identities, and relaxation into yet another thing to optimize.
A rigid sense of purpose can also make life transitions unnecessarily painful. If a person has been conditioned to believe their worth is tied to a single mission, what happens when that mission is no longer viable? This is especially common after major life changes, whether that is career loss, the end of a long-term relationship, or even personal growth that shifts priorities. When purpose is framed as a singular identity rather than a fluid process, change feels like failure rather than evolution.
The alternative is not a rejection of meaning but a more flexible, practical approach to it. Instead of searching for a singular purpose, it may be more useful to cultivate a tolerance for ambiguity. Not every interest needs to be permanent. Not every period of life needs to be tied to a concrete mission. There is value in moments that are meaningful in themselves rather than as a means to a larger purpose. The pursuit of purpose should not become a source of self-judgment. It should be an ongoing conversation, not a demand for certainty.
The pressure to define purpose is often a distraction from living. Meaning does not always arrive in ways that can be neatly explained. The expectation that it should be clear, constant, and productive is not a universal truth. It is a construct: one that many people would be better off questioning.
Comments